Preview: the first 30 seconds of 1:43. The full reel is free on Qrio.
Business
Harvey vs Legora: the brand war in legal AI
A 1:43 reel by Oliver, a creator on Qrio
Two legal AI companies are fighting for space in lawyers' heads with golfers and TV stars, not product features. Who is winning.
Watch the full reel free on Qrio
Reels that make you smarter: business, startups, tech and the world, one minute at a time. Free on Android.
Download Android appTranscript
These two AI companies are at war right now, and not one shot has been fired at the product. Harvey and LaGora are two of the biggest names in legal AI right now, and the war they're fighting is over a few centimeters of space inside of a lawyer's head. I mean, take a look at the casting here. LaGora sponsors a pro-sweetage golfer. Harvey signs Harvey's spectre. Then LaGora goes bigger. The Yankees, Aaron Judge, Jude Law. Harvey answers with PSG, Fulham, and the US Open. So why are two AI companies suddenly behaving like consumer brands? Well, because underneath these products, it's intelligence that they didn't build. Open AI and Thropic Google, they're renting the models. And now, though, same model companies are moving closer to the customer, like Anthropic literally launched Cloth or Legal and then partnered with Freshfields. Imagine your own supplier walking into the category you're trying to create wearing your customer's badge. How do you compete with that? You just take the fight somewhere else, and you do everything it takes to become the first name a lawyer can think of when someone asks the question, what should we be using for AI? That is mental availability. And these brands want to own it because it's the best way for them to justify these outrageous valuations and a product anyone with an API key can approximate. Well, that's maybe a bit exaggerated. I know they spend a lot of time only distribution and becoming a go-to and all of that, but, branding has a big part of that. And Harvey had an incredible head start, by the way. For years, suits had already been connecting one name with the legal world, Harvey. Netflakes reruns kept that memory fresh. Then, the AI company comes along, signs Gabrielle Macth, and suddenly all those old associations become useful. I don't know if they did this intentionally, but they pretty much just found a memory structure that already existed and moved into it. And this is what I find so interesting about AI, because when everyone is renting the same brain, so to speak, what you can actually own becomes much more valuable. Your name, your associations, this space you can occupy in someone's brain.
Transcribed automatically from the video, so small errors are possible.
If you liked this
▶ 2:31Tech & AI
The six layers of the AI stack
by PeterStewieStartup
▶ 1:51Startups
Why the next trillion-dollar company may be an AI services firm
by Oliver
▶ 1:46Business
How Daisy sold out against Apple, Sony and Bose
by Oliver
▶ 2:25Business
Why Bernard Arnault studied a $350 Chinese bag brand
by Amy | 🇨🇳 Business Insights
More Business
▶ 1:04Business
Instamart's groom ad: how a typo became a campaign
by Anurag Bansal
▶ 0:56Business
When KFC ran out of chicken: the FCK apology ad
by Anurag Bansal
▶ 1:19Business
When Samsung got people to trick YouTube's algorithm
by Anurag Bansal
▶ 1:16Business
How a coffee brand made Vadodara curious with mystery flasks
by Anurag Bansal