Business
FIFA wanted $100 million from India. It settled for less than half
By Ashish Kumar · 5 June 2026 · 4 min read

The 2026 World Cup nearly had no home in India. The story of why it almost went dark, and who finally switched the lights on, tells you exactly who runs Indian sport.
The negotiation nobody wanted to talk about
- FIFA opened asking around $100 million for the 2026 and 2030 rights, then cut its ask to about $60 million.
- JioStar, India's biggest platform, talked, put money on the table, and made a final offer of just $15 million before walking away.
- Sony, which aired the 2014 and 2018 tournaments, held discussions but never filed a formal bid.
- Doordarshan entered and produced nothing.
- Ten days before kickoff, Zee signed a deal reported to exceed $40 million.
That final figure is less than half the original ask, and below even the reduced $60 million, which is roughly what Viacom18 paid for the last World Cup. FIFA had already closed deals in more than 180 territories. India, with 1.4 billion people, was the last holdout on earth.
FIFA's press release called India a market of "strategic importance" and "immense potential." It did not mention that FIFA had spent the better part of a year cutting its price in half and watching every credible broadcaster walk.
Why the biggest player walked away
The problem was never the audience. It was the clock.
The 2026 World Cup is being played across the United States, Canada and Mexico. Group-stage matches land in Indian living rooms between ** midnight and 6:30 AM.** No advertiser pays primetime rates for an audience watching at 3 AM, no matter how large it is. That is a structural wall no negotiation can move. On top of that, the Disney-Reliance merger that created JioStar wiped out the bidding war that usually drives these prices up. And JioStar already owns the only thing that reliably prints money in Indian sport: cricket. It did not need a 3 AM football tournament. So the dominant player simply said no.
The company that said yes
Zee did not sign from a position of strength. It signed because it needed a new story.
In January 2024, its $10 billion merger with Sony Pictures Networks India collapsed. When the deal was confirmed dead, Zee's stock fell 30.5% in its worst single day, wiping out nearly 7,300 crore rupees in value. Sony then demanded a $90 million termination fee, which Zee denied owing. A run of weak quarterly profits followed. This was a wounded company. So it did what wounded companies do. It made a bet. Zee launched four new Unite8 Sports channels built specifically around this deal, using a discounted FIFA package as the foundation for a sports platform it is constructing from scratch.
Zee's CEO Punit Goenka framed it as a "clear belief in football's long-term potential." His deputy, Mukund Galgali, called football a sport with "tremendous under-leveraged potential" in India.
Read that carefully. "Under-leveraged" is an admission that the value is not there yet. It is a promise, not a result.
The admission FIFA will never make
Strip out the diplomacy and the truth is simple. These rights were not worth $40 million to any Indian broadcaster on their own commercial terms. The clock alone made the numbers fail. They were worth $40 million to FIFA, to avoid something worse. A blackout in a market of 1.4 billion would not just be embarrassing. FIFA's global sponsors pay for worldwide reach, and India is counted in that promise. Letting it go dark would have weakened FIFA's pitch to every sponsor who signed up on the basis of global audience numbers. So FIFA blinked, and accepted less than half.
What actually happens next
The single most important detail is the length of the deal. Zee did not buy one tournament. It locked in 39 FIFA events through 2034, including three World Cups and the 2027 Women's World Cup. That is a platform investment, not a content purchase. The verdict comes down to one question that no press release can answer. India had over 110 million digital viewers follow Qatar 2022, and not one of them was watching their own team. Are those 110 million a real football audience waiting to be served? Or were they cricket fans who borrowed a few weeks of attention and then went home? So don't watch the price FIFA settled for. **Watch whether India actually becomes a football market. **That answer, not the discount, decides whether Zee made the bargain of the decade or bought itself an expensive problem. It will be settled one quarterly earnings call at a time, over the next eight years.
Watch on Qrio
One-minute reels on this and related topics.
▶ 2:55Geopolitics
The Strait of Hormuz: 33 km that decide your petrol price
by Qrio
▶ 2:34Business
Why Rolex has no owner and no shareholders
by yieveberlins
▶ 2:17Science
Why there are seashells on top of the Himalayas
by anichebhargav
▶ 2:07Startups
How Y Combinator went from a summer experiment to Airbnb and Stripe
by yieveberlins
More business stories

Business
Your milk costs up to ₹4 more from today. Here is who gets the extra money
Amul and Mother Dairy raised milk prices by ₹2 to ₹4 per litre from November 12, 2026. Amul Taaza toned milk is up ₹2 (3.3%) and Amul Gold is up ₹4 (5.5%) across India. In Delhi-NCR, Mother Dairy full cream milk goes from ₹72 to ₹76 a litre and toned milk from ₹60 to ₹62. Both dairies blame costlier fodder, cattle feed, packaging and fuel after an uneven monsoon, and both say most of what you pay goes back to farmers: about 80% for Amul, 75% to 80% for Mother Dairy. It is the second hike since May, and it comes two weeks after Karnataka raised Nandini milk by ₹8.
12 November 2026 · 6 min read

Business
Razorpay plans to list for a third less than its 2021 value, after paying $150 million to come home
Razorpay, the Bengaluru company behind the checkout page on many Indian websites, has reportedly received SEBI's approval for its IPO. Reports put the issue at roughly ₹5,000 to 6,500 crore and the valuation at about $5 billion, with a listing expected between January and March 2027. That is about a third below the $7.5 billion it was valued at in 2021. Razorpay had first moved its parent company from the US to India, a switch reported to have cost about $150 million in taxes. It grew revenue 65% in FY25 to ₹3,783 crore but booked a loss tied to one-time costs. Neither Razorpay nor SEBI has confirmed the approval publicly.
5 November 2026 · 7 min read